Just back from seeing The Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe. It was good, though not mind-blowingly good, and it's been so long since I read the books that I can't be sure it's the source material or what they did with it. From my memory they were remarkably true to the book, but that may say more about my memory than the film. A good two hour romp, with some excellent creatures and effects and a good story.
And so onto the meatier topic......
When I first read The Chronicles of Narnia, of which TLTWATW was once the first book, now supplanted by The Magicians Nephew for chronological reasons, I was oblivious to the Christian allegory that was said to be found there. Even through The Last Battle I was initially unaware that any such intention might be hidden, or not hidden, within what was for me simply a great read. Sure, I got the 'world ends and heaven is a place on earth' (thank you Belinda Carlisle) idea, but how was someone only schooled in the Christian tradition supposed to expect otherwise?
I read them several times, and I would think that by the last reading I would have been aware that maybe something more was going on, but it still seemed like just a great story with an inevitable conclusion. It's probably been twenty years since I last read any of these books, and while my trips through them are in the past, my awareness of allegory, and more specifically, my awareness of people trying to find hidden meanings in all things is all too acute. This desire to see what may not be there runs the gamut from the worst of political correctness to the current 'war on Christmas'. There can be little doubt that the things that people say, write and do are invested with all sorts of meanings, many unintentional and the product of subconscious experience, but sometimes things are less than that, and sometimes they may be more than the individual realizes.
C.S. Lewis was known to have developed a profound Christian faith over the course of his life. If I'm remembering correctly it was something he came into rather than some outgrowth of his childhood experience. That is to say, he became a devout Christian for all the right reasons, rather than because that was what he was brought up to believe and there never really was any other choice. He wrote plenty of books about his faith, but despite all the attempts by people to find it, I don't think that his Narnia tales were among them. And not simply because he said so himself.
The stories in The Bible are not unique. Virgin births, resurrections, you name it, all have found there way into mythologies throughout the world. Don't believe me? Read anything by Joseph Campbell, a man who spent a lifetime studying such things. That's not to take anything away from The Bible, but it does point to the larger idea that is Universal Consciousness. We are all descended from a shared ancestor, and so while we may have developed variety, we have far more in common than not. One of those things is the way our minds work, and the product of this similar functioning is a vast set of mythologies that are often remarkably similar. There is a very interesting article in the latest issue of The Atlantic Monthly that many will find blasphemous, but sane people should take as an interesting food for though.
These shared ideas infuse all of our great stories, and you wouldn't have to consciously set out to include them in order for them to show up. Because Aslan sacrifices himself and is reborn makes him a allegory to Jesus dying on the cross? If that's true why does no one ever refer to the rebirth of Gandalf as Gandalf the White in the same way? CS and JRR were friends. They read their works to one another while teaching at Cambridge (or Oxford, I forget). There certainly are some far more obvious things that come in the later books of Narnia that seem to be stolen intentionally from The Bible, but TLTWATW seems immune to that criticism. It also stands as a far better book than those later ones that wear their allegory on their sleeves.
At the end of it all, it seems that Christians are a very insecure lot. The more vocal of these seem to take every opportunity to invoke their victimhood, despite being memebers of the most powerful and wealthiest religion on Earth. The issues involved are worth several other posts, so I will leave this one as a glancing blow. Needless to say, the fact that this movie is being marketed to Christians as a Christian tale strikes me as both a callous commercial venture (which I've come to be comfortable with generally) and as the latest gambit of the crazy wing of the Christian religion to bloviate on their general underappreciation in the world.
To them I say - suck it up.
20 comments:
CAUTION: SPOILER (for the series, if you've not read it and plan to)
It sounds like you're saying in one place that CS Lewis has come right out and said that the story is NOT allegorical, and in another place saying that it obviously is.
Where do you stand on this? And did he really say that? I would be comfortable giving the non-allegorical interpretation the benefit of the doubt, were it not for the last book, which (for me) left no doubt, and retroactively colored my view of the previous volumes.
I don't necessarily mind allegory. And I've actually (in college religion classes) read a couple of theological writings by Lewis (Mere Christianity and The Great Divorce); and remember appreciating them at the time. But Narnia was such a wonderful, stand-alone fantasy for me through the first six books, that I felt betrayed and very sad when HERE'S THE SPOILER: the whole world was effectively destroyed and made into nothing more than illusion; a metaphor for the end of times and attaining the hereafter. Everything in Narnia destroyed! What was the point of-well-ANYTHING that went before? What a waste of Narnia!
Caution: SPOILER - so spoiled it's rotten.
In a quick bit of searching I couldn't find a source for the CS Lewis quote against allegory, though I thought I'd heard such a thing in the run-up to the movie.
I guess I did contradict myself.
To clarify. Based on some quick reading, when he wrote TLTWATW he had no intentions of writing any sequels and seems to have claimed that at the conclusion of every volume thereafter. TLTWATW is all over the place mythologically, even including Father Christmas as a principal character. It seems a bit of a stretch to ignore all the non-Christian stuff and focus on the sacrifice of Aslan/Jesus to amke your point about the Christian intentions of it.
The last two books to be written, The MAgicians Nephew and the LAst Battle are the two that follow through with the furthering of the Christian allegory idea, particularly The Last Battle. The Magician's Nephew is an extremely loose version of Genesis and The Last Battle as a less loose version of Revelations and the other parts of The Bible concerned with the end of the world. The other 4 books seem negligently allegorical at best, based on my recollection of them.
The whole idea of a 'waste of Narnia' seems very consistent with my understanding of what Christians see as the end of this world. World ends with a battle of good and evil, followed by 1000 years of peace, followed by the end of the world altogether. Narnia, like this world, had its problems, but for either it's a waste.
The fact that the peace is only good for a thousand years is another one of those hits against literal interpretation.
Well, I didn't even see (or let myself see) the parallels between Magician's Nephew & the Bible. It was really only the Last Battle. Maybe it wasn't even the allegory of it all that pissed me off so much-it may have simply been all about the waste of it all and the whole "What's the point?.
I wonder if you would enjoy the movie more if you turned off your brain? :) Don't let the Christian grip on the movie bother you. It's an angle that some Christian organizations are using, but to me, it just looks like a great movie. If people see a Christian allegoy let them. Hell, one could say Star Wars is Christian as well if you work it hard enough. Think about it. A battle between good and evil. Just enjoy the story and the movie for what it really is, which is a movie/story. Those looking hard enough for something usually find it.
I watched it completely removed from the allegory controversy.
My mind was as turned off as it gets.
What was your favorite part? Was Mr. Tumbness cool?
They did a good job with Tumnus, including the actor that played him, though his home was different than I remembered. I have no idea how they did his feet. It was seamless.
Generally, they did a fantastic job with the talking creatures. Mr. and Mrs. Beaver were really well done, and the Centaurs were very impressive.
The children were also good, which can often be the death of these movies.
2 thoughts:
1. I thought using Mr. Tumnus AS Mr. Tumnus was a nice touch.
2. Similarly, I'm glad all those unemployed Centaurs from Xena: Warrior Princess have found themselves some work.
As to the former regarding Tumnus. They really made their work harder by this bold decision. Fauns being part human, part goat, and zero parts dog. Tumnus was very brave to have permitted the shaving and 100 pounds of make-up.
As to the latter...not much work for centaurs these days, nor minotaurs or many of your mythological creatures. They're really counting on sequels.
I hear that they are coming out with a remake of Clash of the Titans. First come first serve Centaurs.
Computer graphics and a lack of Harry Hamlin can only help any remake they may be considering of that old favorite.
Boy I loved that movie.
I was just making that up. They are not remaking that movie. Don't want you to get your hopes up.
Don't be too sure. Hollywood has few original ideas.
And just to prove me right...
http://www.animationmagazine.net/features/6_5.html
It may have gone nowhere, but in 2002 Warner Brothers requested a script for a remake of COTT.
So get off!
Wow! Your fine typing just got me off. :)
The janitor's probably used to cleaning up your messes.
I haven't read the books, but I have read a bit here and there about Tolkien and Lewis. Both intentionally included Christian allegory in their works (Tolkien was the one who, over time, got Lewis to convert from Atheism).
They did read each others works, and Tolkien was a harsh critic of Narnia. He believed that the allegory was too heavy handed, and would turn readers off. He was also a critic of the world that Lewis created. He believed that Lewis mixed too many fantastical elements into the same story.
I thought a quote from Tolkein was, "I detest allegory in all its forms" and that he repeatedly denied there being any such things in TLOR.
You are correct. I misspoke a bit. Lewis intentionally allegorical. Tolkien intentionally included Christian themes, but avoided allegory.
Part of my original point was that Christian themes are universal themes, in other words, not unique to Christianity.
My understanding of Tolkeins's principal criticism with Narnia was only that he seemed to throw everything at it. Father Christmas, Greek and Roman mythology, Christian allegory, pretty much the whole kitchen sink.
Post a Comment